Mohan
Sharing Information | Zero Censorship
INTENTION
My intention with this site is to organize and present information through various formats (including articles, videos and projects) that remains unaltered and unaffected by conventional interpretation. The aim is not to persuade or establish what is right or wrong, but to emphasise what it means to interact with information, it's integral role in shaping our future, with the opportunity to engage with more information for your own research.
Context
We use information to shape our perception, which cultivates the behaviour that sets the direction of our future. This means the likelihood of experiencing our desired reality directly corresponds to the quality of our discernment (how well we organise and take in information). Put simply, the more space we take to consciously and carefully analyse the information we approach, the more informed our choices will be, making it less likely that we form perceptions rooted in unconscious programs.
Unconscious beliefs and programs, regardless of how small, are the greatest threat to the future we aim to align ourselves with. These unconscious patterns are more likely to take root if we analyse information through the clouded lens of emotional bias and unchecked assumptions; this diminishes the quality of our discernment, increasing the probability of unforeseen consequences influencing the path we initially desired to create.
To reduce these unconscious influences, it’s essential to first recognize that poor-quality discernment is what causes them and is responsible for making us walk down paths we thought we were aligned with, only to realise the destination is the very undesired path we've been trying to avoid our whole lives. Secondly, notice that solely relying on impulsive emotional judgments and assumptions may feel effective in the moment; however, this deteriorates the quality of your judgment and pushes the future you're aiming for further off track. Maintaining good discernment requires approaching information with a dispassionate, focused, and open mind, followed by a minimal seasoning of bias and emotional association. Carl Sagan perfectly describes this by stating:
"It seems to me what is called for is an exquisite balance between two conflicting needs: the most skeptical scrutiny of all hypotheses that are offered us and at the same time a great openness to new ideas. If you are only skeptical, then no new ideas make it through to you. On the other hand, if you are open to the point of gullibility and have not an ounce of skeptical sense in you, then you cannot distinguish the useful ideas from the worthless ones."